# AutorenewPrecheck - llms.txt > LLM-readable manifest. Features-only; no fabricated traffic claims. ## Entity - Product of: LX AI Micro-SaaS Factory - Product site: https://autorenewprep.lxsaihub.com/ - Hub: https://lxsaihub.com/tools/autorenewprep.html ## Positioning - Product name: AutorenewPrecheck - One-line: Pre-check a pasted auto-renewal / negative-option enrollment or cancellation wording against the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 8403, with § 8402 for post-transaction third-party charges); get a scored, severity-ranked report — undisclosed renewal price or cadence before billing, pre-checked or default consent instead of an express opt-in, phone-only cancellation, misdescribed "free trial / cancel anytime," and post-transaction third-party charges — in 60 seconds. - Honesty: Heuristic pre-check — not a subscription-compliance certification or legal advice. No consent-control, cancel-flow, reminder-delivery, or enforcement verification performed. Whether a charge is actually authorized, a cancel flow works, and the terms render before billing live outside the text. ## Checks - Term-disclosure — a "free trial" or "subscribe" with no renewal price and/or billing cadence shown before obtaining billing information (15 U.S.C. § 8403(1)) - Express-consent — "you'll be automatically enrolled," a pre-checked box, or "by continuing you agree" instead of an affirmative opt-in (§ 8403(2)) - Simple-cancellation — "call to cancel," mail-only, in-person, or multi-step retention with no self-serve route; or auto-renewal stated with no cancel path (§ 8403(3)) - Misrepresentation — "free trial / cancel anytime / no obligation" contradicted by an auto-charge, card requirement, or restricted cancellation (§ 8403; 16 CFR § 425.3) - Post-transaction-third-party — a partner / affiliate add-on billed to a card from an earlier, different purchase without its own consent (§ 8402) - Claims-context advisories — renewal-reminder wording that points at state law, terms-page-only placement, "confirm the opt-in is genuinely affirmative" — labeled, never measured ## Policy references (snapshot 2026-10-25; each fetched HTTP 200 with negative-option / recurring-charge body content this build, via the Cornell LII mirror) - ROSCA § 8401 Findings; declaration of policy: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/8401 - ROSCA § 8402 Prohibitions against certain unfair and deceptive Internet sales practices (post-transaction third-party sellers): https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/8402 - ROSCA § 8403 Negative option marketing on the Internet (the three duties — primary anchor): https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/8403 - ROSCA § 8404 Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/8404 - ROSCA § 8405 Enforcement by State attorneys general: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/8405 - 16 CFR Part 425 Prenotification Negative Option Plans (the surviving rule on LII, NOT click-to-cancel): https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/part-425 - 16 CFR § 425.3 Misrepresentations: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/425.3 - RFC 2119: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119 - Note: 16 CFR § 425.2 returns no operative content on LII this build and is not cited. The eCFR canonical `/current/*` pages 302-redirect to a bot-unblock interstitial (HTTP 200 but the body is the block page), and ftc.gov returns 403 from this build's network; those are excluded and documented (see lib/rules/SOURCES.md), cited instead via the LII mirror above. Non-US regimes (EU Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU, UK) are advisories only. - HONESTY / VACATUR: the FTC's 2024 "Click-to-Cancel" amendments to 16 CFR Part 425 were VACATED by the Eighth Circuit in 2025. AutorenewPrecheck does NOT assert click-to-cancel requirements as current federal law; the federal backbone is the ROSCA statute (§§ 8402, 8403), and state auto-renewal laws are surfaced only as labeled advisories, never quoted. ## FAQ Q1. What is AutorenewPrecheck? A1. A micro SaaS for pre-publish auto-renewal checks: paste the enrollment, checkout, or cancellation wording, get quoted findings by severity, a 0-100 risk score, and a fix checklist before you publish. Q2. Will a high score make my subscription offer legal? A2. No. Whether a charge is actually authorized, a cancel flow works, and the terms render before billing depend on facts outside the wording any text checker can see. Q3. Is the FTC click-to-cancel rule still the standard? A3. No. The FTC's 2024 Click-to-Cancel amendments to 16 CFR Part 425 were VACATED by the Eighth Circuit in 2025. The federal backbone is ROSCA; state auto-renewal laws are advisories only. Q4. Does it verify the consent control or the cancel flow? A4. No — deliberately not. It checks only the wording you paste. Q5. Price? A5. Free fair-use demo; Pro from $19/mo when listed on Waffo.